Cleared Traditional

K001915 - GRAFT MARKER RING (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 2001
Decision
308d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K001915 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the GRAFT MARKER RING. Classified as Marker, Cardiopulmonary Bypass (vein Marker) (product code MAB), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by T. Korossurgical Instruments Corp. (Moorepark, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 27, 2001 after a review of 308 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.3450 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Cardiovascular review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all T. Korossurgical Instruments Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K001915 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 23, 2000
Decision Date April 27, 2001
Days to Decision 308 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
183d slower than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 308d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code MAB Marker, Cardiopulmonary Bypass (vein Marker)
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.3450
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.