Cleared Traditional

K002414 - PHOTOTHERAPY LAMP 900IW501JE PHOTOTHERAPY POWER MODULE 900IW502JE (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II General Hospital device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Sep 2000
Decision
49d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K002414 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the PHOTOTHERAPY LAMP 900IW501JE PHOTOTHERAPY POWER MODULE 900IW502JE. Classified as Unit, Neonatal Phototherapy (product code LBI), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Fisher &Paykel Healthcare , Ltd. (East Tamaki, Auckland, NZ). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on September 25, 2000 after a review of 49 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the General Hospital FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 880.5700 - the FDA general hospital device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Fisher &Paykel Healthcare , Ltd. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K002414 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 07, 2000
Decision Date September 25, 2000
Days to Decision 49 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel General Hospital (HO)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
79d faster than avg
Panel avg: 128d · This submission: 49d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LBI Unit, Neonatal Phototherapy
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 880.5700
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most General Hospital devices follow this clearance model.