Cleared Traditional

CODMAN BACTISEAL CATHETERS (K003322) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Neurology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Oct 2001
Decision
342d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K003322 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the CODMAN BACTISEAL CATHETERS. Classified as Catheter, Ventricular (product code HCA), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Codman & Shurtleff, Inc. (Raynham, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on October 1, 2001 after a review of 342 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Neurology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 882.4100 - the FDA neurology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Neurology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Codman & Shurtleff, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K003322 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 24, 2000
Decision Date October 01, 2001
Days to Decision 342 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Neurology (NE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
194d slower than avg
Panel avg: 148d · This submission: 342d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code HCA Catheter, Ventricular
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 882.4100
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Neurology devices follow this clearance model.