Cleared Traditional

K010283 - THERASEED(R) PALLADIUM-103 IMPLANT (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Also includes:
MODEL 200

Class II Radiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K010283 · Theragenics Corp. · Radiology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 2001
Decision
86d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K010283 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the THERASEED(R) PALLADIUM-103 IMPLANT. Classified as Source, Brachytherapy, Radionuclide (product code KXK), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Theragenics Corp. (Buford, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 26, 2001 after a review of 86 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Radiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 892.5730 - the FDA radiology and imaging software oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Theragenics Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K010283 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received January 30, 2001
Decision Date April 26, 2001
Days to Decision 86 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Radiology (RA)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
21d faster than avg
Panel avg: 107d · This submission: 86d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KXK Source, Brachytherapy, Radionuclide
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 892.5730
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Radiology devices follow this clearance model.