Cleared Traditional

K013052 - KONICA LASER IMAGER, DRYPRO MODEL 751/752 (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Radiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 2002
Decision
127d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K013052 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the KONICA LASER IMAGER, DRYPRO MODEL 751/752. Classified as Camera, Multi Format, Radiological (product code LMC), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Konica Minolta Medical & Graphic, Inc. (Hachioji-Shi Tokyo, JP). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 16, 2002 after a review of 127 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Radiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 892.2040 - the FDA radiology and imaging software oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Radiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Konica Minolta Medical & Graphic, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K013052 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received September 11, 2001
Decision Date January 16, 2002
Days to Decision 127 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Radiology (RA)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
20d slower than avg
Panel avg: 107d · This submission: 127d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LMC Camera, Multi Format, Radiological
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 892.2040
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Radiology devices follow this clearance model.