Cleared Abbreviated

K013219 - PROTOCO2L INSUFFLATOR MODEL 6400 (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Gastroenterology & Urology device cleared through the Abbreviated 510(k) pathway - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Feb 2002
Decision
146d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K013219 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the PROTOCO2L INSUFFLATOR MODEL 6400. Classified as Insufflator, Automatic Carbon-dioxide For Endoscope (product code FCX), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by E-Z-Em, Inc. (Westbury, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on February 19, 2002 after a review of 146 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Gastroenterology & Urology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 876.1500 - the FDA gastroenterology and urology device framework. The Abbreviated 510(k) pathway was used, relying on FDA-recognized standards to demonstrate substantial equivalence.

Device pattern: Standards-based predicate clearance. Standards-verified equivalence. The Abbreviated pathway signals strong alignment with FDA-recognized performance standards - typically associated with lower review burden and faster clearance cycles.

View all E-Z-Em, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K013219 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received September 26, 2001
Decision Date February 19, 2002
Days to Decision 146 days
Submission Type Abbreviated
Review Panel Gastroenterology & Urology (GU)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
16d slower than avg
Panel avg: 130d · This submission: 146d
Pathway characteristics
Standards-based clearance path.

Device Classification

Product Code FCX Insufflator, Automatic Carbon-dioxide For Endoscope
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 876.1500
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Gastroenterology & Urology devices follow this clearance model.