Cleared Traditional

K022721 - UROPOWER (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Gastroenterology & Urology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Aug 2003
Decision
375d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K022721 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the UROPOWER. Classified as Uroflowmeter (product code EXY), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by W.O.M. World of Medicine AG (Alexandria, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on August 26, 2003 after a review of 375 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Gastroenterology & Urology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 876.1800 - the FDA gastroenterology and urology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Gastroenterology & Urology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all W.O.M. World of Medicine AG devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K022721 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 16, 2002
Decision Date August 26, 2003
Days to Decision 375 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Gastroenterology & Urology (GU)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
245d slower than avg
Panel avg: 130d · This submission: 375d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code EXY Uroflowmeter
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 876.1800
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Gastroenterology & Urology devices follow this clearance model.