Cleared Traditional

K022887 - INTERPHALANGEAL FLEXIBLE STABILIZING ROD SYSTEM (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Orthopedic device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K022887 · Osteomed Corp. · Orthopedic device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Nov 2002
Decision
88d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K022887 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the INTERPHALANGEAL FLEXIBLE STABILIZING ROD SYSTEM. Classified as Prosthesis, Toe, Constrained, Polymer (product code KWH), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Osteomed Corp. (Addison, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on November 26, 2002 after a review of 88 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Orthopedic FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 888.3720 - the FDA orthopedic device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Osteomed Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K022887 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 30, 2002
Decision Date November 26, 2002
Days to Decision 88 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Orthopedic (OR)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
34d faster than avg
Panel avg: 122d · This submission: 88d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KWH Prosthesis, Toe, Constrained, Polymer
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 888.3720
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Orthopedic devices follow this clearance model.