Cleared Abbreviated

K023825 - FILM PROCESSOR, MODEL LIFE RAY PRO 2500 (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Radiology device cleared through the Abbreviated 510(k) pathway - typically does not require clinical trials.

K023825 · S.A.I.E.P. S.R.L. · Radiology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Feb 2003
Decision
90d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K023825 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the FILM PROCESSOR, MODEL LIFE RAY PRO 2500. Classified as Processor, Radiographic-film, Automatic (product code IXW), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by S.A.I.E.P. S.R.L. (Weatherford, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on February 12, 2003 after a review of 90 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Radiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 892.1900 - the FDA radiology and imaging software oversight framework. The Abbreviated 510(k) pathway was used, relying on FDA-recognized standards to demonstrate substantial equivalence.

Device pattern: Standards-based predicate clearance. Standards-verified equivalence. The Abbreviated pathway signals strong alignment with FDA-recognized performance standards - typically associated with lower review burden and faster clearance cycles.

View all S.A.I.E.P. S.R.L. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K023825 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received November 14, 2002
Decision Date February 12, 2003
Days to Decision 90 days
Submission Type Abbreviated
Review Panel Radiology (RA)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
17d faster than avg
Panel avg: 107d · This submission: 90d
Pathway characteristics
Standards-based clearance path.

Device Classification

Product Code IXW Processor, Radiographic-film, Automatic
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 892.1900
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Radiology devices follow this clearance model.