Cleared Traditional

K030330 - CTXA HIP EXTENDED REFERENCE DATA (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Radiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K030330 · Mindways Software, Inc. · Radiology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jun 2003
Decision
140d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K030330 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the CTXA HIP EXTENDED REFERENCE DATA. Classified as Densitometer, Bone (product code KGI), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Mindways Software, Inc. (San Francisco, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on June 20, 2003 after a review of 140 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Radiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 892.1170 - the FDA radiology and imaging software oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Radiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Mindways Software, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K030330 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received January 31, 2003
Decision Date June 20, 2003
Days to Decision 140 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Radiology (RA)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
33d slower than avg
Panel avg: 107d · This submission: 140d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KGI Densitometer, Bone
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 892.1170
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Radiology devices follow this clearance model.