Cleared Traditional

GM3 SERIES IF TENS, MODEL GM3X2IF (WHERE X IS A PARAMETER OF DIFFERENT HOUSING) (K032719) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Neurology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 2003
Decision
99d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K032719 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the GM3 SERIES IF TENS, MODEL GM3X2IF (WHERE X IS A PARAMETER OF DIFFERENT HOUSING). Classified as Interferential Current Therapy (product code LIH), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Gemore Technology Co, Ltd. (Tan Shui, Taipei Hsien, TW). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 10, 2003 after a review of 99 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Neurology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 882.5890 - the FDA neurology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Neurology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Gemore Technology Co, Ltd. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K032719 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received September 02, 2003
Decision Date December 10, 2003
Days to Decision 99 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Neurology (NE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
49d faster than avg
Panel avg: 148d · This submission: 99d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LIH Interferential Current Therapy
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 882.5890
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Neurology devices follow this clearance model.