Cleared Traditional

K033316 - TABLE TILT DEVICE (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Radiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K033316 · Brainlab AG · Radiology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 2004
Decision
212d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K033316 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the TABLE TILT DEVICE. Classified as Couch, Radiation Therapy, Powered (product code JAI), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Brainlab AG (Heimstetten, DE). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 14, 2004 after a review of 212 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Radiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 892.5770 - the FDA radiology and imaging software oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Radiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Brainlab AG devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K033316 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 15, 2003
Decision Date May 14, 2004
Days to Decision 212 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Radiology (RA)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
105d slower than avg
Panel avg: 107d · This submission: 212d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code JAI Couch, Radiation Therapy, Powered
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 892.5770
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Radiology devices follow this clearance model.