Cleared Traditional

K040111 - ZEUS SCIENTIFIC, INC., ATHENA MULTI-LYTE MPO/PR3 IGG TEST SYSTEM (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Immunology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 2004
Decision
76d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K040111 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ZEUS SCIENTIFIC, INC., ATHENA MULTI-LYTE MPO/PR3 IGG TEST SYSTEM. Classified as Test System, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies (anca) (product code MOB), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Zeus Scientific, Inc. (Branchburg, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 5, 2004 after a review of 76 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5660 - the FDA immunology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Zeus Scientific, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K040111 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received January 20, 2004
Decision Date April 05, 2004
Days to Decision 76 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
28d faster than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 76d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code MOB Test System, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies (anca)
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5660
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.