Cleared Traditional

K041978 - REPROCESSED DIAMOND BURS (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Neurology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Nov 2004
Decision
123d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K041978 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the REPROCESSED DIAMOND BURS. Classified as Drills, Burrs, Trephines And Accessories (simple Powered), Reprocessed (product code NLN), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Alliance Medical Corp. (Phoenix, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on November 23, 2004 after a review of 123 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Neurology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 882.4310 - the FDA neurology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Neurology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Alliance Medical Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K041978 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 23, 2004
Decision Date November 23, 2004
Days to Decision 123 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Neurology (NE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
25d faster than avg
Panel avg: 148d · This submission: 123d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code NLN Drills, Burrs, Trephines And Accessories (simple Powered), Reprocessed
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 882.4310
Definition Reprocessing Validation Data For This Device Type Must Be Included In A 510(k) Submission. (70 Fr 56911, Available At Https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/fr-2005-09-29/pdf/05-19510.pdf).
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Neurology devices follow this clearance model.