Cleared Abbreviated

K042786 - BEST MODEL # 81-01 SERIES IR-192 SOURCES (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Radiology device cleared through the Abbreviated 510(k) pathway - typically does not require clinical trials.

K042786 · Best Medical International, Inc. · Radiology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Nov 2004
Decision
43d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K042786 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the BEST MODEL # 81-01 SERIES IR-192 SOURCES. Classified as Source, Brachytherapy, Radionuclide (product code KXK), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Best Medical International, Inc. (Springfield, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on November 18, 2004 after a review of 43 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Radiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 892.5730 - the FDA radiology and imaging software oversight framework. The Abbreviated 510(k) pathway was used, relying on FDA-recognized standards to demonstrate substantial equivalence.

Device pattern: Standards-based predicate clearance. Standards-verified equivalence. The Abbreviated pathway signals strong alignment with FDA-recognized performance standards - typically associated with lower review burden and faster clearance cycles.

View all Best Medical International, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K042786 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 06, 2004
Decision Date November 18, 2004
Days to Decision 43 days
Submission Type Abbreviated
Review Panel Radiology (RA)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
64d faster than avg
Panel avg: 107d · This submission: 43d
Pathway characteristics
Standards-based clearance path.

Device Classification

Product Code KXK Source, Brachytherapy, Radionuclide
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 892.5730
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Radiology devices follow this clearance model.