Cleared Special

K051773 - MODEL 3873 1* 8 AND MODEL 3874 1* 8 COMPACT TEST STIMULATION LEADS (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Neurology device cleared through the Special 510(k) pathway - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 2005
Decision
27d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K051773 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the MODEL 3873 1* 8 AND MODEL 3874 1* 8 COMPACT TEST STIMULATION LEADS. Classified as Stimulator, Spinal-cord, Implanted (pain Relief) (product code GZB), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Medtronic Inc.,Neurological Division. (Miinneapolis, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 28, 2005 after a review of 27 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Neurology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 882.5880 - the FDA neurology device framework. As a Special 510(k), this submission covers a manufacturer modification to an existing cleared device rather than a new device introduction.

Device pattern: Iterative device modification. Low regulatory complexity profile. This Special 510(k) clearance confirms that the manufacturer's modifications remained within the established regulatory envelope of the original cleared device.

View all Medtronic Inc.,Neurological Division. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K051773 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 01, 2005
Decision Date July 28, 2005
Days to Decision 27 days
Submission Type Special
Review Panel Neurology (NE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
121d faster than avg
Panel avg: 148d · This submission: 27d
Pathway characteristics
Modification to existing cleared device.

Device Classification

Product Code GZB Stimulator, Spinal-cord, Implanted (pain Relief)
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 882.5880
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Neurology devices follow this clearance model.