Cleared Traditional

K052555 - MEDTRONIC PERFORMER TM CPB, MODEL R51, PCPB (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Mar 2006
Decision
180d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K052555 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the MEDTRONIC PERFORMER TM CPB, MODEL R51, PCPB. Classified as Console, Heart-lung Machine, Cardiopulmonary Bypass (product code DTQ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Rand S.R.L. (Minneapolis, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on March 15, 2006 after a review of 180 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.4220 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Cardiovascular review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Rand S.R.L. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K052555 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received September 16, 2005
Decision Date March 15, 2006
Days to Decision 180 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
55d slower than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 180d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DTQ Console, Heart-lung Machine, Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.4220
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.