Cleared Traditional

K052979 - 1125 XSB XENON FIBER-OPTIC LIGHT SOURCE (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II General & Plastic Surgery device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Oct 2005
Decision
7d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K052979 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the 1125 XSB XENON FIBER-OPTIC LIGHT SOURCE. Classified as Illuminator, Fiberoptic, Surgical Field (product code HBI), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Isolux, LLC (Naples, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on October 31, 2005 after a review of 7 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the General & Plastic Surgery FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 878.4580 - the FDA general and plastic surgery device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Isolux, LLC devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K052979 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 24, 2005
Decision Date October 31, 2005
Days to Decision 7 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel General & Plastic Surgery (SU)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review Yes - reviewed by an FDA-accredited third party
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
107d faster than avg
Panel avg: 114d · This submission: 7d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required. Third-party reviewed.

Device Classification

Product Code HBI Illuminator, Fiberoptic, Surgical Field
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 878.4580
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most General & Plastic Surgery devices follow this clearance model.