Cleared Traditional

K061360 - NEOMARKERS RABBIT MONOCLONAL ANTI-HUMAN ESTROGEN RECE[PTOR ANTIBODY (CLONE SP1) (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Pathology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jun 2006
Decision
42d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K061360 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the NEOMARKERS RABBIT MONOCLONAL ANTI-HUMAN ESTROGEN RECE[PTOR ANTIBODY (CLONE SP1). Classified as Immunohistochemistry Antibody Assay, Estrogen Receptor (product code MYA), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Lab Vision Corp. (Fremont, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on June 27, 2006 after a review of 42 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Pathology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 864.1860 - the FDA pathology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Lab Vision Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K061360 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 16, 2006
Decision Date June 27, 2006
Days to Decision 42 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Pathology (PA)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
35d faster than avg
Panel avg: 77d · This submission: 42d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code MYA Immunohistochemistry Antibody Assay, Estrogen Receptor
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 864.1860
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Pathology devices follow this clearance model.