Cleared Traditional

K061775 - WAKO L-TYPE CREATININE-M TEST, AND WAKO CREATININE CALIBRATOR (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Chemistry device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Feb 2007
Decision
245d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K061775 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the WAKO L-TYPE CREATININE-M TEST, AND WAKO CREATININE CALIBRATOR. Classified as Enzymatic Method, Creatinine (product code JFY), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Wako Chemicals USA, Inc. (Richmond, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on February 23, 2007 after a review of 245 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1225 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Chemistry review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Wako Chemicals USA, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K061775 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 23, 2006
Decision Date February 23, 2007
Days to Decision 245 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
157d slower than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 245d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code JFY Enzymatic Method, Creatinine
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1225
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.