Cleared Abbreviated

K073571 - TRICOS T RESORBABLE BONE SUBSTITUTE (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Dental device cleared through the Abbreviated 510(k) pathway - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 2008
Decision
110d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K073571 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the TRICOS T RESORBABLE BONE SUBSTITUTE. Classified as Bone Grafting Material, Synthetic (product code LYC), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Baxter Healthcare Corporation (Mcgaw Park, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 8, 2008 after a review of 110 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Dental FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.3930 - the FDA dental device regulatory framework. The Abbreviated 510(k) pathway was used, relying on FDA-recognized standards to demonstrate substantial equivalence.

Device pattern: Standards-based predicate clearance. Standards-verified equivalence. The Abbreviated pathway signals strong alignment with FDA-recognized performance standards - typically associated with lower review burden and faster clearance cycles.

View all Baxter Healthcare Corporation devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K073571 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received December 20, 2007
Decision Date April 08, 2008
Days to Decision 110 days
Submission Type Abbreviated
Review Panel Dental (DE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
17d faster than avg
Panel avg: 127d · This submission: 110d
Pathway characteristics
Standards-based clearance path.

Device Classification

Product Code LYC Bone Grafting Material, Synthetic
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.3930
Definition A Synthetic Bone Grafting Material Is Synthetically-derived Device, Such As Hydroxylapatite, Intended To Fill, Augment, Or Reconstruct Periodontal And Or Bony Defects Of The Upper Or Lower Jaw.
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Dental devices follow this clearance model.