Cleared Traditional

K083796 - MILTEX ASPIRATING SYRINGE, MILTEX PETITE ASPIRATING SYRINGE, MILTEX SELF-ASPIRATING SYRINGE, MILTEX LIGHTWEIGHT (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Dental device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K083796 · Miltex, Inc. · Dental device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Mar 2009
Decision
77d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K083796 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the MILTEX ASPIRATING SYRINGE, MILTEX PETITE ASPIRATING SYRINGE, MILTEX SELF-ASPI.... Classified as Syringe, Cartridge (product code EJI), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Miltex, Inc. (York, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on March 9, 2009 after a review of 77 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Dental FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.6770 - the FDA dental device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Miltex, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K083796 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received December 22, 2008
Decision Date March 09, 2009
Days to Decision 77 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Dental (DE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
50d faster than avg
Panel avg: 127d · This submission: 77d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code EJI Syringe, Cartridge
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.6770
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Dental devices follow this clearance model.