Cleared Traditional

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY X-RAY SYSTEM, PAX-REVE3D (K090171) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Radiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 2009
Decision
97d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K090171 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY X-RAY SYSTEM, PAX-REVE3D. Classified as X-ray, Tomography, Computed, Dental (product code OAS), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by E-Woo Technology (Houston, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 30, 2009 after a review of 97 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Radiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 892.1750 - the FDA radiology and imaging software oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Radiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all E-Woo Technology devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K090171 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received January 23, 2009
Decision Date April 30, 2009
Days to Decision 97 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Radiology (RA)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
10d faster than avg
Panel avg: 107d · This submission: 97d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code OAS X-ray, Tomography, Computed, Dental
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 892.1750
Definition Produce Cross-sectional Diagnostic X-ray Images Of The Intra-oral Tissue And Teeth.
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Radiology devices follow this clearance model.