Cleared Traditional

K090584 - INTRABEAM SYSTEM WITH BALLOON APPLICATOR AND CBG SETS (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Radiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Nov 2009
Decision
266d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K090584 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the INTRABEAM SYSTEM WITH BALLOON APPLICATOR AND CBG SETS. Classified as System, Therapeutic, X-ray (product code JAD), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Carl Zeiss Surgical GmbH (North Attleboro, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on November 24, 2009 after a review of 266 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Radiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 892.5900 - the FDA radiology and imaging software oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Radiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Carl Zeiss Surgical GmbH devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K090584 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received March 03, 2009
Decision Date November 24, 2009
Days to Decision 266 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Radiology (RA)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
159d slower than avg
Panel avg: 107d · This submission: 266d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code JAD System, Therapeutic, X-ray
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 892.5900
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Radiology devices follow this clearance model.