Cleared Traditional

K092194 - POLYBONE DENTAL (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Dental device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jun 2010
Decision
330d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K092194 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the POLYBONE DENTAL. Classified as Bone Grafting Material, Synthetic (product code LYC), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Kyung Won Medical Co., Ltd. (Santa Fe Springs, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on June 16, 2010 after a review of 330 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Dental FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.3930 - the FDA dental device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Dental review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Kyung Won Medical Co., Ltd. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K092194 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 21, 2009
Decision Date June 16, 2010
Days to Decision 330 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Dental (DE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
203d slower than avg
Panel avg: 127d · This submission: 330d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LYC Bone Grafting Material, Synthetic
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.3930
Definition A Synthetic Bone Grafting Material Is Synthetically-derived Device, Such As Hydroxylapatite, Intended To Fill, Augment, Or Reconstruct Periodontal And Or Bony Defects Of The Upper Or Lower Jaw.
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Dental devices follow this clearance model.