Cleared Traditional

EUROIMMUN ANTI-M2-3E ELISA (IGG) (K092736) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Immunology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Sep 2010
Decision
363d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K092736 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the EUROIMMUN ANTI-M2-3E ELISA (IGG). Classified as Antimitochondrial Antibody, Indirect Immunofluorescent, Antigen, Control (product code DBM), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Euroimmun Us, Inc. (Morristown, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on September 2, 2010 after a review of 363 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5090 - the FDA immunology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Immunology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Euroimmun Us, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K092736 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received September 04, 2009
Decision Date September 02, 2010
Days to Decision 363 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
259d slower than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 363d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DBM Antimitochondrial Antibody, Indirect Immunofluorescent, Antigen, Control
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5090
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.