Cleared Traditional

K093459 - ELIA GLIADIN DP IGA IMMUNOASSAY AND ELIA GLIADIN DP IGG IMMUNOASSAY, MODELS 14-5538-01, 14-5539-01 (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Immunology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Aug 2010
Decision
280d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K093459 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ELIA GLIADIN DP IGA IMMUNOASSAY AND ELIA GLIADIN DP IGG IMMUNOASSAY, MODELS 1.... Classified as Antibodies, Gliadin (product code MST), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Phadia US, Inc. (Portage, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on August 13, 2010 after a review of 280 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5750 - the FDA immunology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Immunology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Phadia US, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K093459 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received November 06, 2009
Decision Date August 13, 2010
Days to Decision 280 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
176d slower than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 280d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code MST Antibodies, Gliadin
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5750
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.