Cleared Traditional

K103028 - EEVATM PETRI DISH

K103028 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for EEVATM PETRI DISH by Auxogyn, Inc.. It is a Class 2 Obstetrics & Gynecology device (product code MQK) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 302-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Aug 2011
Decision
302d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K103028 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the EEVATM PETRI DISH. Classified as Labware, Assisted Reproduction (product code MQK), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Auxogyn, Inc. (Menlo Park, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on August 11, 2011 after a review of 302 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Obstetrics & Gynecology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 884.6160 - the FDA obstetrics and gynecology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Obstetrics & Gynecology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Auxogyn, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K103028 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 13, 2010
Decision Date August 11, 2011
Days to Decision 302 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Obstetrics & Gynecology (OB)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
142d slower than avg
Panel avg: 160d · This submission: 302d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code MQK Labware, Assisted Reproduction
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 884.6160
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Obstetrics & Gynecology devices follow this clearance model.