Cleared Traditional

K103080 - ALBOGRAFT VASCULAR PROSTHESIS (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 2011
Decision
92d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K103080 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ALBOGRAFT VASCULAR PROSTHESIS. Classified as Graft, Vascular, Synthetic/biologic Composite (product code MAL), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (Bedford, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 19, 2011 after a review of 92 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.3450 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Cardiovascular review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K103080 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 19, 2010
Decision Date January 19, 2011
Days to Decision 92 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
33d faster than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 92d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code MAL Graft, Vascular, Synthetic/biologic Composite
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.3450
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.