Cleared Traditional

PILLAR PALATAL IMPLANT SYSTEM (K110623) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Dental device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K110623 · Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · Dental device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Feb 2012
Decision
344d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K110623 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the PILLAR PALATAL IMPLANT SYSTEM. Classified as Device, Anti-snoring (product code LRK), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Medtronic Xomed, Inc. (Jacksonville, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on February 10, 2012 after a review of 344 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Dental FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.5570 - the FDA dental device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Dental review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Medtronic Xomed, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K110623 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received March 03, 2011
Decision Date February 10, 2012
Days to Decision 344 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Dental (DE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
217d slower than avg
Panel avg: 127d · This submission: 344d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LRK Device, Anti-snoring
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.5570
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Dental devices follow this clearance model.

Regulatory Peers - LRK Device, Anti-snoring

All 80
Devices cleared under the same product code (LRK) and FDA review panel - the closest regulatory comparables to K110623.
REST EAZY Appliance
K172760 · Insert Molding Solutions, Inc. · Mar 2018
The Panthera Anti-Snoring X3 Device
K171576 · Panthera Dental, Inc. · Feb 2018
Snorer's Friend
K171529 · Scope Healthcare Technologies Pty, Ltd. · Jan 2018
RESPIRONICS CUSTOM I ORAL APPLIANCE
K033822 · Respironics, Inc. · Feb 2004
RESPIRONICS CUSTOM II ORAL APPLIANCE
K033823 · Respironics, Inc. · Feb 2004