Cleared Traditional

K110628 - SIMPLEABI (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Radiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 2011
Decision
70d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K110628 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SIMPLEABI. Classified as Monitor, Ultrasonic, Nonfetal (product code JAF), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Newman Medical (Arvada, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 12, 2011 after a review of 70 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Radiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 892.1540 - the FDA radiology and imaging software oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Newman Medical devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K110628 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received March 03, 2011
Decision Date May 12, 2011
Days to Decision 70 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Radiology (RA)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review Yes - reviewed by an FDA-accredited third party
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
37d faster than avg
Panel avg: 107d · This submission: 70d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required. Third-party reviewed.

Device Classification

Product Code JAF Monitor, Ultrasonic, Nonfetal
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 892.1540
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Radiology devices follow this clearance model.