Cleared Traditional

K112443 - ARCHITECT ACTIVE B-12 (HOLOTRANSCOBALAMIN) (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Chemistry device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 2011
Decision
117d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K112443 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ARCHITECT ACTIVE B-12 (HOLOTRANSCOBALAMIN). Classified as Radioassay, Vitamin B12 (product code CDD), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Axis-Shield Diagnostics, Ltd. (Dundee, Scotland, GB). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 19, 2011 after a review of 117 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1810 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Chemistry review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Axis-Shield Diagnostics, Ltd. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K112443 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 24, 2011
Decision Date December 19, 2011
Days to Decision 117 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
29d slower than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 117d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code CDD Radioassay, Vitamin B12
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1810
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.