Cleared Traditional

K120014 - STA- COAG CONTROL (N+ABN) PLUS (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Hematology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Mar 2013
Decision
441d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K120014 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the STA- COAG CONTROL (N+ABN) PLUS. Classified as Plasma, Coagulation Control (product code GGN), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Diagnostica Stago, Inc. (Parisppany, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on March 14, 2013 after a review of 441 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Hematology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 864.5425 - the FDA hematology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: High-complexity regulatory submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. The extended review timeline suggests the FDA required additional documentation before confirming substantial equivalence - a pattern common in complex or first-of-kind Hematology submissions.

View all Diagnostica Stago, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K120014 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received December 29, 2011
Decision Date March 14, 2013
Days to Decision 441 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Hematology (HE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
328d slower than avg
Panel avg: 113d · This submission: 441d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code GGN Plasma, Coagulation Control
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 864.5425
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Hematology devices follow this clearance model.