Cleared Traditional

K122012 - Z-MED Z-MED II (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Oct 2012
Decision
86d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K122012 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the Z-MED Z-MED II. Classified as Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty (product code OZT), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by NuMED, Inc. (Hopkinton, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on October 4, 2012 after a review of 86 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.1255 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all NuMED, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K122012 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 10, 2012
Decision Date October 04, 2012
Days to Decision 86 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
39d faster than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 86d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code OZT Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.1255
Definition A Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty Catheter Is Indicated For Balloon Valvuloplasty Of The Aortic Valve.
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.