Cleared Traditional

K122513 - CLEARED UNDER GRAFTON II EDBM (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Orthopedic device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Mar 2013
Decision
201d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K122513 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the CLEARED UNDER GRAFTON II EDBM. Classified as Filler, Bone Void, Osteoinduction (w/o Human Growth Factor) (product code MBP), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. (Memphis, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on March 6, 2013 after a review of 201 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Orthopedic FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 888.3045 - the FDA orthopedic device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Orthopedic review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K122513 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 17, 2012
Decision Date March 06, 2013
Days to Decision 201 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Orthopedic (OR)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
79d slower than avg
Panel avg: 122d · This submission: 201d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code MBP Filler, Bone Void, Osteoinduction (w/o Human Growth Factor)
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 888.3045
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Orthopedic devices follow this clearance model.