Cleared Traditional

K122766 - THERMO SCIENTIFIC QMS EVEROLIMUS ASSAY (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Chemistry device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Aug 2013
Decision
344d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K122766 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the THERMO SCIENTIFIC QMS EVEROLIMUS ASSAY. Classified as Everolimus Immunoassay (product code OUF), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Microgenics Corp. (Fremont Blvd., US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on August 20, 2013 after a review of 344 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.3840 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Chemistry review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Microgenics Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K122766 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received September 10, 2012
Decision Date August 20, 2013
Days to Decision 344 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
256d slower than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 344d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code OUF Everolimus Immunoassay
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.3840
Definition To Quantify Everolimus In Whole Blood.
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.