Cleared Traditional

K132735 - AXIA RADIAL HEAD SYSTEM (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Orthopedic device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 2014
Decision
126d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K132735 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the AXIA RADIAL HEAD SYSTEM. Classified as Prosthesis, Elbow, Hemi-, Radial, Polymer (product code KWI), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Imds (Innovative MEdical Device Systems) - Leis ME (Orlando, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 7, 2014 after a review of 126 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Orthopedic FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 888.3170 - the FDA orthopedic device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Orthopedic review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Imds (Innovative MEdical Device Systems) - Leis ME devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K132735 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received September 03, 2013
Decision Date January 07, 2014
Days to Decision 126 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Orthopedic (OR)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
4d slower than avg
Panel avg: 122d · This submission: 126d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KWI Prosthesis, Elbow, Hemi-, Radial, Polymer
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 888.3170
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Orthopedic devices follow this clearance model.