Cleared Traditional

K132984 - SR VIVODENT S, SR ORTHOTYP S, SR ORTHOLINGUAL S (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Dental device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 2014
Decision
112d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K132984 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SR VIVODENT S, SR ORTHOTYP S, SR ORTHOLINGUAL S. Classified as Denture, Plastic, Teeth (product code ELM), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Ivoclar Vivadent, Inc. (Amherst, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 14, 2014 after a review of 112 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Dental FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.3590 - the FDA dental device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Dental review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Ivoclar Vivadent, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K132984 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received September 24, 2013
Decision Date January 14, 2014
Days to Decision 112 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Dental (DE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
15d faster than avg
Panel avg: 127d · This submission: 112d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code ELM Denture, Plastic, Teeth
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.3590
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Dental devices follow this clearance model.