Cleared Special

K162538 - ADVIA Centaur Insulin (IRI) Master Curve Material (MCM), ADVIA Centaur (IRI) Calibrator (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Chemistry device cleared through the Special 510(k) pathway - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Nov 2016
Decision
66d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K162538 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ADVIA Centaur Insulin (IRI) Master Curve Material (MCM), ADVIA Centaur (IRI) .... Classified as Calibrator, Secondary (product code JIT), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics (East Walpole, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on November 17, 2016 after a review of 66 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1150 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. As a Special 510(k), this submission covers a manufacturer modification to an existing cleared device rather than a new device introduction.

Device pattern: Iterative device modification. Low regulatory complexity profile. This Special 510(k) clearance confirms that the manufacturer's modifications remained within the established regulatory envelope of the original cleared device.

View all Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K162538 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received September 12, 2016
Decision Date November 17, 2016
Days to Decision 66 days
Submission Type Special
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
22d faster than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 66d
Pathway characteristics
Modification to existing cleared device.

Device Classification

Product Code JIT Calibrator, Secondary
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1150
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.