Cleared Traditional

K162816 - SML-OSA2 Appliances (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Dental device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 2017
Decision
294d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K162816 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SML-OSA2 Appliances. Classified as Device, Jaw Repositioning (product code LQZ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Selane Products, Inc. (Chatsworth, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 27, 2017 after a review of 294 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Dental FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.5570 - the FDA dental device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Dental review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Selane Products, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K162816 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 06, 2016
Decision Date July 27, 2017
Days to Decision 294 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Dental (DE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
167d slower than avg
Panel avg: 127d · This submission: 294d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LQZ Device, Jaw Repositioning
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.5570
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Dental devices follow this clearance model.