Cleared Traditional

K171883 - Sysmex UF-5000 Fully Automated Urine Particle Analyzer (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Hematology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 2018
Decision
304d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K171883 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the Sysmex UF-5000 Fully Automated Urine Particle Analyzer. Classified as Counter, Urine Particle (product code LKM), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Sysmex America, Inc. (Lincolnshire, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 23, 2018 after a review of 304 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Hematology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 864.5200 - the FDA hematology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Hematology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Sysmex America, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K171883 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 23, 2017
Decision Date April 23, 2018
Days to Decision 304 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Hematology (HE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
191d slower than avg
Panel avg: 113d · This submission: 304d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LKM Counter, Urine Particle
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 864.5200
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Hematology devices follow this clearance model.