Cleared Traditional

K173689 - Ophthalmic Software Platform RX (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Ophthalmic device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K173689 · Canon Inc. -Medical Equipment Group · Ophthalmic device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Feb 2018
Decision
84d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K173689 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the Ophthalmic Software Platform RX. Classified as System, Image Management, Ophthalmic (product code NFJ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Canon Inc. -Medical Equipment Group (Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki, JP). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on February 23, 2018 after a review of 84 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Ophthalmic FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 892.2050 - the FDA ophthalmic device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Canon Inc. -Medical Equipment Group devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K173689 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received December 01, 2017
Decision Date February 23, 2018
Days to Decision 84 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Ophthalmic (OP)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
26d faster than avg
Panel avg: 110d · This submission: 84d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code NFJ System, Image Management, Ophthalmic
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 892.2050
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Ophthalmic devices follow this clearance model.