Cleared Traditional

Endocular Viewing Lenses and Silicone Ring (K173944) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Ophthalmic device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Oct 2018
Decision
303d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K173944 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the Endocular Viewing Lenses and Silicone Ring. Classified as Lens, Contact, Polymethylmethacrylate, Diagnostic (product code HJK), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Phakos (Montreuil, FR). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on October 25, 2018 after a review of 303 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Ophthalmic FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 886.1385 - the FDA ophthalmic device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Ophthalmic review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Phakos devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K173944 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received December 26, 2017
Decision Date October 25, 2018
Days to Decision 303 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Ophthalmic (OP)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
193d slower than avg
Panel avg: 110d · This submission: 303d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code HJK Lens, Contact, Polymethylmethacrylate, Diagnostic
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 886.1385
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Ophthalmic devices follow this clearance model.

Regulatory Consultant

The OrthoMedix Group, Inc.
J. D. Webb

The regulatory consultant manages the 510(k) submission process on behalf of the applicant - coordinating technical documentation, predicate strategy and FDA communications. Identifying the consultant behind a submission is a key signal for competitive regulatory intelligence.