Cleared Traditional

K181307 - Zimmer Nexel Total Elbow, Connrad/Morrey Total Elbow (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Orthopedic device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 2019
Decision
256d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K181307 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the Zimmer Nexel Total Elbow, Connrad/Morrey Total Elbow. Classified as Prosthesis, Elbow, Constrained, Cemented (product code JDC), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Zimmer, Inc. (Warsaw, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 28, 2019 after a review of 256 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Orthopedic FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 888.3150 - the FDA orthopedic device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Orthopedic review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Zimmer, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K181307 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 17, 2018
Decision Date January 28, 2019
Days to Decision 256 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Orthopedic (OR)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
134d slower than avg
Panel avg: 122d · This submission: 256d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code JDC Prosthesis, Elbow, Constrained, Cemented
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 888.3150
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Orthopedic devices follow this clearance model.