Cleared Traditional

K181571 - OASYS Oral/Nasal Airway System and OASYS Herbst with Dentitrac Patient Monitor (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Dental device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Apr 2019
Decision
309d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K181571 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the OASYS Oral/Nasal Airway System and OASYS Herbst with Dentitrac Patient Monitor. Classified as Sleep Appliances With Patient Monitoring (product code PLC), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Mark Abramson, D.D.S., Inc. (Redwood City, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 19, 2019 after a review of 309 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Dental FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.5570 - the FDA dental device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Dental review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

Submission Details

510(k) Number K181571 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 14, 2018
Decision Date April 19, 2019
Days to Decision 309 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Dental (DE)
Summary Summary PDF
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
151d slower than avg
Panel avg: 158d · This submission: 309d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code PLC Sleep Appliances With Patient Monitoring
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.5570
Definition For The Treatment Of Night Time Snoring And Mild To Moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea In Patients 18 Years Of Age Or Older While Also Measuring Patient Compliance To Oral Appliance Therapy.
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Dental devices follow this clearance model.