Cleared Traditional

StimaWELL 120MTRS (K181645) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Neurology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Aug 2020
Decision
783d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K181645 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the StimaWELL 120MTRS. Classified as Stimulator, Nerve, Transcutaneous, For Pain Relief (product code GZJ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Pierenkemper GmbH (Ehringshausen, DE). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on August 13, 2020 after a review of 783 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Neurology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 882.5890 - the FDA neurology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: High-complexity regulatory submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. The extended review timeline suggests the FDA required additional documentation before confirming substantial equivalence - a pattern common in complex or first-of-kind Neurology submissions.

View all Pierenkemper GmbH devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K181645 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 22, 2018
Decision Date August 13, 2020
Days to Decision 783 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Neurology (NE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
635d slower than avg
Panel avg: 148d · This submission: 783d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code GZJ Stimulator, Nerve, Transcutaneous, For Pain Relief
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 882.5890
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Neurology devices follow this clearance model.

Regulatory Consultant

Emergo Global Consulting
Andre Kindsvater

The regulatory consultant manages the 510(k) submission process on behalf of the applicant - coordinating technical documentation, predicate strategy and FDA communications. Identifying the consultant behind a submission is a key signal for competitive regulatory intelligence.

Regulatory Peers - GZJ Stimulator, Nerve, Transcutaneous, For Pain Relief

All 605
Devices cleared under the same product code (GZJ) and FDA review panel - the closest regulatory comparables to K181645.
STIMPOD NMS460 Nerve Stimulator
K252712 · Algiamed Technologies USA, Inc. · May 2026
actiTENS mini
K252767 · Sublimed · Jan 2026
CP Relief Wand Rx - TENS/NMES
K252236 · N & C Holdings, LLC · Aug 2025
Unipro (K-UNIPRO-US)
K232441 · Tenscare, Ltd. · Aug 2024
TENSWave
K241228 · Zynex Medical Officer · Aug 2024
Electrical Neuromuscular Stimulator, Cure Trio
K233046 · Oriental Inspiration Limited · Apr 2024