Cleared Traditional

ADVIA Centaur Erythropoietin (EPO) assay (K183088) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Hematology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Aug 2019
Decision
269d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K183088 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ADVIA Centaur Erythropoietin (EPO) assay. Classified as Assay, Erythropoietin (product code GGT), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Axis-Shield Diagnostics Limited (Dundee, GB). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on August 2, 2019 after a review of 269 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Hematology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 864.7250 - the FDA hematology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Hematology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Axis-Shield Diagnostics Limited devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K183088 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received November 06, 2018
Decision Date August 02, 2019
Days to Decision 269 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Hematology (HE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
156d slower than avg
Panel avg: 113d · This submission: 269d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code GGT Assay, Erythropoietin
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 864.7250
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Hematology devices follow this clearance model.