Cleared Traditional

K191734 - MatriStem UBM Pericardial Patch (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Nov 2019
Decision
147d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K191734 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the MatriStem UBM Pericardial Patch. Classified as Intracardiac Patch Or Pledget, Biologically Derived (product code PSQ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Acell, Inc. (Columbia, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on November 22, 2019 after a review of 147 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.3470 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Cardiovascular review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Acell, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K191734 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 28, 2019
Decision Date November 22, 2019
Days to Decision 147 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
22d slower than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 147d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code PSQ Intracardiac Patch Or Pledget, Biologically Derived
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.3470
Definition To Repair Defects, To Be Used For Patch Grafting, To Repair Tissue, And To Buttress Sutures In The Heart And Vasculature.
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.