Cleared Traditional

K202540 - EliA Rib-P (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Immunology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K202540 · Phadia AB · Immunology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Sep 2021
Decision
376d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K202540 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the EliA Rib-P. Classified as Anti-ribosomal P Antibodies (product code MQA), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Phadia AB (Uppsala, SE). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on September 13, 2021 after a review of 376 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5100 - the FDA immunology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Immunology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Phadia AB devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K202540 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received September 02, 2020
Decision Date September 13, 2021
Days to Decision 376 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
272d slower than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 376d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code MQA Anti-ribosomal P Antibodies
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5100
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.

Regulatory Consultant

Phadia US, Inc.
Sheryl Skinner

The regulatory consultant manages the 510(k) submission process on behalf of the applicant - coordinating technical documentation, predicate strategy and FDA communications. Identifying the consultant behind a submission is a key signal for competitive regulatory intelligence.