Cleared Traditional

K222610 - Elecsys Anti-Tg (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Immunology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Sep 2023
Decision
382d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K222610 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the Elecsys Anti-Tg. Classified as System, Test, Thyroid Autoantibody (product code JZO), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Roche Diagnostics (Indianapolis, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on September 15, 2023 after a review of 382 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5870 - the FDA immunology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Immunology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Roche Diagnostics devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K222610 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 29, 2022
Decision Date September 15, 2023
Days to Decision 382 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
278d slower than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 382d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code JZO System, Test, Thyroid Autoantibody
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5870
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.